Thursday, June 12, 2025

Moore Siblings

    ©  Kathy Duncan, 2025

In my search for the family of Joseph Barber's wife Arsena, I found a tentative group of Moores who were all selling the same 40 acres of land to Armistead Richardson of Richmond County, Georgia in 1836. All the deeds were filed in Floyd County, Georgia. That group includes Samuel B. Moore, Mary Ann Moore, and Joseph Barber of Dooly County, Georgia; Abel Moore and Bryant Moore of Sumter County, Georgia; and Wiley Moore of Pulaski County, Georgia.

Samuel B. Moore, Mary Ann Moore, and Joseph Barber sold their portion of Lot no. 860 for $100, so they each received $33. Abel Moore and Bryant Moore sold their share for $50, or $25 each. Wiley Moore sold his share for $20. Armstead or Armistead Richardson paid a total of $170 for Lot no. 860. In 1839, Richardson sold Lot no. 860 along with other lots to his son-in-law William S. Simmons. The Williams S. Simmons Plantation house, also known as the Montgomery Farm, of Cave Springs, Georgia, was built in 1840 on Lot no. 870 and is on the National Register of Historic Places. 

This potential group of siblings likely inherited 40 acres of land from either their father or a bachelor brother. Who was that person? I had two clues about that piece of land: 1.) it was 40 acres, and 2.) it was Lot no. 860. Those clues suggested that the land might have been part of a Georgia Land Lottery. I quickly found that the 1832 Georgia Gold Lottery consisted of 40-acre lots, which were available to bachelors over 18 years old (1 draw), widows (1 draw), a family of orphans  (2 draws), married men, who were heads of a family,  (2 draws). In addition, participants were required to be three year  residents of Georgia and U.S. citizens. 

Then I looked for lot no. 860 in the Gold Lottery, which I found on Family Search along with the name of the original owner.















Lot no. 860, consisting of 40 acres, was granted to L. D. Moore of Mashburn's District in Pulaski County, Georgia.

I went back through my documentation for Joseph Barber and found someone I had forgotten about: Lorenzo D. Moore. In 1833, Joseph Barber of Pulaski County, Georgia, granted a power of attorney to Lorenzo D. Moore of Pulaski County, Georgia, to act as Joseph's representative in his claim to his grandfather, Thomas Mashburn's estate in Onslow County, North Carolina. That document was filed in Onslow County, North Carolina.

The Floyd County, Georgia land that Lorenzo D. Moore won in the Gold Lottery ended up with his heirs: Samuel B. Moore, Mary Ann Moore, the wife of Joseph Barber, Abel Moore, Bryant Moore, and Wiley Moore. Of these heirs, Bryant Moore, born  c. 1799, was one of the eldest. Joseph Barber's wife Arcena Barber was born c. 1812. A rough idea of the siblings' birthdate range gives me a clue as to whether Lorenzo D. Moore was their brother or their father. The real clue, however, is in Lorenzo's name. He, like hundreds of baby boys born in that period, was named after the Methodist itinerant minister, Lorenzo Dow. Dow traveled from Georgia and North Carolina back to New England in 1810. A brief search of North Carolina newspapers in Genealogybank reveals that Dow had extensive preaching engagements in 1811. His itineraries were published several times. I would say that Lorenzo D. Moore would not have been born much earlier than this and was probably born a little later. Therefore, Lorenzo D. Moore would have been one of the siblings. Lorenzo's name also gives me a clue as to possible church denomination records for the Moore family - Methodist. 

Now I have a large group of siblings in various locations to connect to potential parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins. It's actually a lot to work with.  



Sunday, June 8, 2025

Joseph Barber and the Moore Family

   ©  Kathy Duncan, 2025

When George Washington Barber, son of Joseph and Arcenia Barber, died in Fannin County, Texas in 1920, his son George Washington Barber Jr., was the informant for George Sr.'s death certificate. The question has long been, how much did George Jr. get right? Under consideration today is the information about George Sr's mother. George Barber Jr. believed that she was Amelia Moor [sic]. Nothing indicates that her first name was Amelia, which would make looking for her easier. Instead, she was Arcenia - with many spelling variants - in all records about Joseph Barber's wife. Was she a Moore? It's very possible that George Sr. knew his mother's family and told his son about them, so the surname may have been reported accurately.

The problem has been connecting Joseph and Arcenia Barber to anyone named Moore. That is until the full-text search on Family Search provided a significant clue in Floyd County, Georgia, dated 1836.

























In 1836, Samuel Barber, Mary Ann Barber, and Joseph Barber of Dooly County, Georgia, deeded 40 acres of land, lot no 860, located in Cherokee County, Georgia to Armstead Richardson. In this record, my best guess is that Joseph Barber is acting in right of his wife Arcenia Barber, and that Samuel and Mary Ann Barber are probably her siblings. On the next page, Abel Moore and Bryant Moore of Sumter County, Georgia deeded the same piece of land to Armstead Richardson. On the next page, Wiley Moore of Pulaski County, Georgia deeded the same piece of land to Armstead Richardson. 

It appears that Samuel Moore, Mary Ann Moore, Arcenia Barber, Abel Moore, Bryant Moore, and Wiley Moore are all heirs to the same piece of property and are likely to be siblings. They have probably inherited from a bachelor brother, their father, or their grandfather. More needs to be discovered about this 40-acre piece of property. 

More also needs to be uncovered about each of these Moore siblings. 

Monday, June 2, 2025

James S Piper, 1845

  ©  Kathy Duncan, 2025

In 1845, James S. Piper of Baltimore was being taken to court for being insolvent:






Besides having cash flow issues, this little notice provides a wealth of additional information about James S. Piper. It's the first reference that I have found that indicates James S. Piper was working in construction. It also provides a street address for either his business or his household although they may have been one and the same. 

Other published activities indicate that James S. Piper was in Ward 12. This 1844 street map of Baltimore narrows down which section of Mulberry St. was in Ward 12:















One month prior to the publication of this notice, James S. Piper and his wife Mary O'Hara had lost their little son Henry Clay Piper. They still had at least one surviving child, Horatio N. Piper. 

Although cash flow was an issue, James S. Piper was working on two construction sites at the end of the year. This article appeared in The Sun on December 8, 1845, instead of a follow-up to the outcome of the insolvency court: 
















Thursday, March 20, 2025

Col. J. S. Piper, 1862





 ©  Kathy Duncan, 2025


In 1862, the wife of Col. J. S. Piper of the Confederate army was arrested in Washington DC and held by the Provost Marshall. The newspapers misreported his name as Col. T. S. Piper, which made her arrest a challenge to find in period newspapers. Plus, the newspapers of 1863 misreported this event as having happened in 1861. 



 
















A similar newspaper article published in The New York Herald added the tidbit that "at the time of her arrest several letters from her husband were seized." Based on the events of 1863, this leaves no doubt that the woman arrested was Elizabeth Piper, wife of Col. J. S. Piper. This also confirms that he was with the Confederate army.












It would be interesting to know why Elizabeth Piper had fallen under enough suspicion to arrest her. By August 1862, women were no longer regarded by the military as harmless innocents. Rose O'Neal Greenhow, who operated a spy network of supposedly 48 women in Washington DC, had been released from the Old Capitol prison and sent beyond the Confederate line a couple of months earlier in May 1862. Women in her network had been attending teas and dinners throughout Washington DC, listening carefully, and sending the information they gleaned south to the Confederate army. Elizabeth Piper was certainly in a position to be one of those participants. However, information about the specific women in Greenhow's network is elusive.

To date, I have not found the Provost Marshall's records regarding Elizabeth Piper's arrest - specifically the documents that were generated in 1862. I also don't know how long she was held or the conditions of her release although she was allowed to remain in Washington DC and not sent beyond the Confederate line. Col. William Emile Doster was the Provost Marshal of Washington DC at this time.

The Washington DC City Directory of 1862 shows the Pipers still in residence at 506 E south. James S. Piper's 14 or 15-year-old son William Piper is listed as the resident. Note that James S. Piper's brother Dr. John R. Piper was living at 373 D north.














Col. James S. Piper, 1861

        ©  Kathy Duncan, 2025

The American Civil War began on 12 April 1861 when the Confederates opened fire on Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor, South Carolina.

Col. James S. Piper was in Alabama at the time.















When Maryland Governor Hicks answered Lincoln's call for troops, Marylanders in Alabama were aghast. Among them was Col. James S. Piper. Again, he was talking to newspapermen, and he expressed the desire to join the Confederate army. The question of whether he joined the army would play an important role two years later. 

This particular newspaper clipping makes an important connection in the chain of evidence that links the events of Capt. James S. Piper's life. It clearly, references James S. Piper as being both the Captain of Company B in the Mexican War and the Colonel who served under General Walker in Nicaragua. Additionally, it identifies him as a Confederate sympathizer willing to serve in the military. In 1861, James S. Piper would have been 43 years old. While not a young man, he was not too old to serve.

Within two days, Col. James S. Piper was back in Baltimore, Maryland, where he promptly spoke to yet another newspaperman.


 





The affray referred to is now known as the Baltimore Riot of 1861. It is also referred to as the Pratt Street Riots or the Pratt Street Massacre. In 1861, Baltimore was largely a city of southern sympathizers. On Friday, 19 April 1861, a riot broke out when members of the Massachusetts and Pennsylvania state militias, who had been called up for service, were en route to Washington DC. Their route took them through Baltimore, where they were attacked by Confederate sympathizers. A riot ensued that resulted in the first deaths of Union volunteers in the Civil War. 

Why Col. James S. Piper traveled to Baltimore instead of Washington DC is yet another question. There is reason to believe that his wife and son were still residence at 506 E south in Washington DC. Of course, at this time, Col. James S. Piper's sisters were probably still living in Baltimore, so he may have wanted to see them. Alternately, he may have preferred a city with southern sympathies as his destination.






James S. Piper, 1859 - 1860

       ©  Kathy Duncan, 2025

James S. Piper returned to Washington, DC after his time in Nicaragua. If he completed a secret mission after his time there, I don't know what that entailed.

In 1859, James returned to his work as a contractor and advertised for men to work as pavers as well as for men to haul stone and gravel. He appears to have also been hiring the horses and carts needed to haul. 







The 1860 Washington DC City Directory places the residence of James Piper, the bricklayer, at 506 E South. 









The quest for the exact location of 506 E south will have to wait for another post, but this Civil War era map shows its proximity to the Capital building and to the Navy Yard. There were two E streets in Washington DC. One E street was located north of the Capital building, and the other E street was located south of the Capital building. This was also true of other lettered streets.


Civil War era map of Washington DC










The 1860 census gives us a snapshot of James S. Piper's household on 1 June 1860:





This census tells us that in 1860 James S. Piper, the contractor, was 42 years old and was born in Maryland. He owned no real estate and had $200 in personal property. His wife Elizabeth was 34 years old and was also born in Maryland. James S. Piper's son William H. Piper was 12 years old and was born in DC. William H. Piper had attended school within the last year.

To date, I have not determined what Elizabeth's maiden name was. I have determined that she was probably James S. Piper's second wife. His first wife was Mary O'Hara, who he married on 2 August 1841 in Baltimore, Maryland:
























In 1845, their young son Henry Clay Piper died.

























It should be noted that Henry Clay was a Whig who ran for president in 1844, the year of little Henry Clay Piper's birth. Henry Clay lost to James K. Polk. Ironically, Clay became a strong critic of the Mexican War. 

Another son, Horatio N Piper (aka Horace) was living in his grandfather Philip Piper's household in 1850. Horace was 8 years old and was born in Maryland. In 1870, Horatio N. Piper was boarding with L M Busey in Baltimore and working as a bookkeeper. In 1880, he was still living in Baltimore but with his wife Cora and two of his elderly Piper aunts: Lizzie and Mary. He was still working as a bookkeeper. 

Horatio N Piper married Cora E. Fletch in Boston, Massachusetts on 25 July 1873. His marriage record states that he was the son of James S. and Mary Piper. Cora was the daughter of Gilman S. and Sarah Fletch. 

James S. Piper and Mary O'Hara had at least two children:

1. Horatio N. Piper, born 1842 in Maryland
2. Henry Clay Piper, born 1844 in Maryland

At this point, it is impossible to know if William H. Piper, born in 1848, was the son of Mary O'Hara or Elizabeth. It is also impossible to know if there were additional children. 

On 15 June 1849, the Daily National Intelligencer included Mrs. Elizabeth Piper in their list of letters at the post office. At this point, it is impossible to know if this same Elizabeth married James S. Piper.












Locating James S. Piper on the 1850 census would clarify some of these questions. 


















Monday, January 20, 2025

John Byrum, Bastardy Bond

      ©  Kathy Duncan, 2025

In a previous post, I explored the bastardy bond imposed on John Byrum's mother-in-law, Tabitha Barnes in Edgecombe County, North Carolina, in 1836. John Byrum and Treacy Barnes had been married for about four years when that action was taken.

However, it turns out that John Byrum was no saint. In 1832, he was taken to court in a bastardy bond case:









John Byrum appeared on 26 February 1833, where he was ordered to pay Betsey Webb $15 for her lying in expenses and $10 a year for the next six years. In 1833, $15 was equal to about $564 in 2025, and $10 was equal to about $375. 

Treacy Barnes and John Byrum had been married for a little over a year. It's impossible to say exactly when Betsey Webb's child was born since no age is provided. At this point, I have not been able to pinpoint the name or gender of that child.

There was more than one Elizabeth Webb in Edgecombe County at this time; however, a strong candidate is Elizabeth Webb, the widow of Willie Webb.







On 23 February 1835, Elizabeth Webb was in court to secure her bond as guardian to her children: Wealthy, Delphi, Reddick, and Eli Webb. James Barnes Jr. and John Byrum were her securities. Elizabeth Webb's child with John Byrum is not named in the bond because that child was not an heir of Willie Webb's. 


Sunday, January 19, 2025

Tabitha Barnes, Mother of Treacy

      ©  Kathy Duncan, 2025

My husband's ancestor, Ralph Henderson Byrum, was the son of John Byrum and Lucretia or Treacy Barnes, who were living in Madison County, Tennessee by 1850. With them was an older woman named Tabitha Barnes, who was assumed to be Treacy's mother. Not much was ever found about Treacy even though researchers knew that the Byrums had come from Edgecombe County, North Carolina, since John Byrum and Treacy Barnes married in Edgecombe County, North Carolina on 17 January 1832. Enter the full-text search on Family Search to change all that.

On the 1850 census, John Byrum was 40 and born in North Carolina, and wife Treacy was 35 and born in North Carolina. Their children were eight children Justice - 18, born NC; Henry - 16,  born NC; Rhea - 14, born NC; Rufus - 11, born NC; Micajah - 9, born TN; Winneford - 7, born TN; John R. T. - 3, born TN; William F - 0, born, TN. In addition, there was Tabitha Barns - 58, born NC; and Amanda Barns - 14, born NC. 

The census reveals that the Byrums moved from North Carolina to Tennessee sometime between 1839 and 1841. That's a narrow window. Tabitha Barns is old enough to be Treacy's mother. Amanda Barns is old enough to be either Tabitha's daughter or granddaughter. Tabitha's husband has been a mystery. Additionally, a firm connection between Tabitha and Treacy has not been established.

Less than an hour with the full-text search answered most of these questions. 

This account record from Edgecombe County neatly ties together John Byrum, Treacy, and Tabitha Barnes:














Teresa Barnes, now Teresa Byrum, orphan of Jesse Barnes dec's, with Tabitha Barnes as her guardian. John Byrum signed this document, which was recorded in February 1832 - just a month after the marriage of Treacy and John. 

Earlier records in Edgecombe County reveal that Tabitha was the relict of Jesse Barnes. Her share of his estate was one-third and Teresa's was two-thirds. Those documents also reveal that he died in January of 1817. My takeaway is that he probably did not have any other children since no one else seemed to be entitled to a share of his estate.

On 23 August 1839, Tabitha Barnes, John Byrum, and Tracy Byrum joined together to sell the land that Tabitha and Tracy had inherited from Jesse Barnes. This would have been around the time that they were all preparing to move to Tennessee. My conclusion is that Tracy Byrum was the daughter of Jesse and Tabitha Barnes.

So who was Amanda Barnes? That's where it gets really interesting. Amanda Barnes is clearly not the daughter of Jesse Barnes. Jesse died in 1817 while Amanda was born in 1836. There is no indication that Tabitha remarried to another Barnes. Amanda cannot be the daughter of Tracy (Barnes) Byrum since she was born four years after Tracy and John Byrum married - that would make her a Byrum not a Barnes.

The full-text search cleared up this matter, too. In 1836, Tabitha Barnes was named in a bastardy bond action in the Edgecombe County Court Minutes:






Transcript: Ordered that George W. Luster pay until Court Fifteen Dollars & Ten Dollars annually for the next succeeding six years commencing from this Term for support of a Bastard Child begotten on the Body of Tabitha Barnes. 

This record corresponds to the birth date of Amanda Barnes - about 1836. At that time, Tabitha Barnes would have been about 44 years old - not too old to have another child.

There were a surprisingly large number of illegitimate children born in early Edgecombe County.  I am not sure that bearing an illegitimate resulted in a large amount of social stigma. There were several cases of young couples suing the father of the wife's illegitimate child for support - a child that she was either pregnant with or had born before or after her marriage to another man. Obviously, having an illegitimate child did not make a woman an undesirable marriage partner. 

At this time, I am still searching for Tabitha Barne's parents. There is a surprisingly large number of Tabithas living in early Edgecombe County, so I can't narrow much down that way. 

Tracy (Barnes) Byrum's formal name Lucretia might help me find a connection. There were several Jesse Barnes in Edgecombe County, and I don't have them sorted out yet. 



Wednesday, January 1, 2025

Hello, 2025

      ©  Kathy Duncan, 2025

Happy New Year! 















I did a lot of research last year, but only managed thirteen blog posts. Five of those posts were about James S. Piper. I still need to finish that series of posts. I've brought him to the brink of the Civil War when his story really starts to heat up, so I need to get back to that project. 

There were 63,414 page views this year, bringing the total to 268,456. However, there were a lot of bots trolling the internet last year, so that number is probably not reflective of human readers.

The three most popular posts were as follows:

1. The Dendys and the Fatal Accident. This post explores the idea that my great-great-grandparents were in a horrific accident that killed one of their daughters. Because she was born and died between census years, her name is unknown. I believe this is the event that prompted the Dendys move from Wood County, Texas to Bowie County, Texas.

2. Capt. James S. Piper, 1846. This is the first post in the James S. Piper series. Yes, I'm feeling guilty for not getting all of the posts in the series written and posted. 

3. John Deloss Brown, Candidate for Sheriff. Through newspaper articles, I have been able to flesh out many of the details of John D. Brown's life.

While popular, these are not the posts that represented breakthroughs in my research. Those posts are as follows:

1. Solomon Nevill Sr's Last Years. My research turned up information that proved Solomon Nevill Sr. had a wife after Barbara Walton and that a divorce occurred between Solomon and Barbara. Solomon spent his last years with his second wife and then with his son E.W. Nevill. He died in Gibson County, Tennessee, not Montgomery County, Tennessee. There were a lot of surprises and family drama in this information.

2. Lodowick and Nathaniel Thompson - Greenville Co., Virginia. This post is a bit skimpy, but it links Lodowick Thompson to another adult Thompson, who may be a family member. 

3. Spencer P. Lewis, son of John and Susan Lewis. I don't get a lot of credit for this "discovery." I was able to confirm my hunch that Spencer P. Lewis of Anderson County, Texas was the son of John D. Lewis. Another researcher's contributions to Family Search provided proof of Spencer's birthdate, birthplace, and parentage. This is a key piece of information in the quest to identify John D. Lewis's own origins and information about his wife or wives.