Wednesday, May 29, 2024

Capt James S. Piper, 1847 - 1848

      ©  Kathy Duncan, 2024


The beginning of 1847 saw Capt. James S. Piper still leading Company B of the Baltimore Battalion in the Mexican War. On 1 April 1847, the Baltimore Sun published this list of men serving under Piper in Tampico, Mexico. This list is of value since Piper may have provided affidavits for some of these men or may be mentioned in any memoirs they wrote.














By 11 June 1847, Company B was headed back to the States on the brig Columbus. 














This clipping from The Sun on 19 June 1847, seems to be the first time James S. Pipe provided information to a newspaper editor. Throughout his life, he conversed with various editors and had his comments published. This became a pattern of behavior. 






















After arriving in New Orleans, Capt. James S. Piper performed the eulogy for Sergeant William H. Hickman of Company F. His words brought some to tears.






















It was not until 29 June 1847 that newspapers began reporting that Capt. James S. Piper had been robbed of $200 while in Tampico.
















This is the most revealing and heartrending description of the men who returned with Capt. Piper to the U.S. They were sunburnt and emaciated. 
























By the end of the year, Capt James S. Piper was offering to prepare the paperwork that his men needed to provide proof of their service so that they could obtain their land warrants or treasury scrip. He was actively trying those who were wounded in battle as well as the widows and orphans of men who had been killed.

















It's impossible to know if he was aware of the plight of Mrs. Beacham, the widow of one of his men. An appeal for her was published in November 1846.






















In 1848, James S. Piper seems to have made it his mission to assist all veterans of the Mexican War. He also seems to have been earning a little money by advocating for them. Note that he was a resident of Washington DC at this time.



























Monday, May 27, 2024

Capt James S. Piper, 1846

     ©  Kathy Duncan, 2024

In honor of Memorial Day, I am kicking off a series of posts about my first cousins' ancestor, James S. Piper, who was a Mexican War veteran. For decades, I only knew that James S. Piper was a Captain in the Mexican War from Baltimore, that he was in Lamar County, Texas by 1880, that his wife was named Mary Ann, and that his descendants had some of his effects, which I remember as being a uniform and some documents that I never saw. 

Over the years, I came across a James S. Piper on the 1860 District of Columbia census who was the same age, was also born in Maryland, and was a contractor but had a different wife and son. There was never enough information to connect the two men. The years rocked by.

Then last fall, my cousin posted a photograph of James S. Piper's Mexican War Veteran medal, which inspired me to take another stab at trying to find more information.












I turned to newspapers, and the floodgates opened. Newspapers allowed me to connect the dots and revealed a man who led a very, very active life.

The newspaper clippings for 1846 provided important family information for James S. Piper.

On 23 May 1846, The Sun, of Baltimore, Maryland, reported that Captain James S. Piper was raising an infantry company and had already recruited 60 men. It's notable that he already has the title of Captain. Was he elected Captain, or was Captain an honorary title that he already had?










Five days later, the Baltimore Daily Commercial, reported that the volunteers had elected James S. Piper as their captain. However, just because this was reported five days later does not mean that he was elected captain between May 23 and May 28. This election may have occurred before the 23rd and was merely reported later.







By June 2nd, Capt. Piper's company was in Washington D.C. where they were to receive their uniforms and equipment.











Even though he was in Washington, D.C., Piper continued to recruit men from Baltimore.










By 24 July 1846, Piper's company was in Brazos Santiago. The American Republican and Baltimore Daily Clipper printed letters written by members of his company. 



























On 11 August 1846, the Easton Star of Easton, Maryland published a letter that James S. Piper had sent from the mouth of the Rio Grande to his brother in Washington D. C. Unfortunately, his brother was not named. 
























James S. Piper wrote this very lengthy letter from Monterey in October of 1846:



















































On 6 November, Capt. James S. Piper wrote yet another letter to his brother in Washington D.C., but this time his brother was named: Dr. John R. Piper.

























The obituary for Dr. John R. Piper that appeared in the Baltimore Sun on 18 March 1871 revealed that his father, and therefore, Capt. James S. Piper's father was Philip Piper of Baltimore:






The newspaper clippings of 1846 reveal that James S. Piper was a well-educated individual with a penchant for letter writing. I hope that more letters will turn up among his extended family members. 



Sunday, March 31, 2024

John Deloss Brown, Candidate for Sheriff

    ©  Kathy Duncan, 2024

John Deloss Brown of Pike County, Illinois, flirted briefly with running for sheriff in 1880. I was able to positively identify this J.D. Brown as being him based on my knowledge that he had served in the Civil War, was associated with Republicans, and had served as Justice of the Peace for Nixon township.














However, shortly after throwing his hat in the ring, J.D. Brown had a change of heart and withdrew his candidacy. Apparently, he thought he was not known well enough to be successful in his bid. It makes me wonder if someone actively discouraged him. 



Sunday, February 25, 2024

The Dendys and The Fatal Accident

   ©  Kathy Duncan, 2024

This newspaper clipping, reprinted in The Troy Messenger of Troy, Alabama, on 9 March 1876, recounts a horrific accident that happened in Wood County, Texas. The six-year-old daughter of the Dendy family was crushed to death in a hack accident while the family was returning home from church. My Dendy great-great grandparents moved from near Troy, Alabama to Wood County, Texas, and lived there in the 1870s, but was this my family? My great-great-grandfather, James Hogan Dendy, had a brother who also moved from near Troy, Alabama to Wood County, Texas. I finally decided it was time to investigate.






















Since this article mentions J.R. Wright and the Alvis family as the other parties involved, I revisited the available records with these individuals in mind. On the 1870 census, J. H. Dendy and his family were living in precinct four of Wood County. Also, in precinct four was J.R. Wright. In 1870, James H Dendy's brother Lawson Dendy was still in Goshen Hill, Pike County, Alabama. 

The 1876 Wood County tax list places J. H. Dendy and Jno R. Write in precinct four. Lawson Dendy was not present on the 1876 list. By 1877, Lawson Dendy was in Wood County along with his brother James H. Dendy, but the Wood County records no longer divided tax records up by precinct, so it is impossible to know which precinct Lawson was in. In November of 1877, James Hogan Dendy and wife Lydia Ann Pugh sold their property in the Antonio Flores survey and moved to Bowie County, Texas. From Bowie County, it would have been impossible to visit very easily with family back in Wood County. That's surprising given that the 1880 census reveals that Lawson Dendy brought their mother Nancy (Williams) Dendy with him to Wood County and that Lydia's sister Hannah (Pugh) Hooks had moved to Wood County. Why did James and Lydia leave Wood County just as other family members were arriving - family they had not lived near in at least six years? 

On the 1880 Wood County, Texas census, J. R. Wright was still living in precinct four, there was an Alvis family in precinct four, and Lydia's sister Hannah Hooks was living in precinct four. Lawson Dendy and family with mother Ann Dendy were in precinct one. 

In comparing family group sheets for James Hogan Dendy and for Lawson Dendy, neither one had a daughter born around 1870 who died or disappeared abruptly. There is a gap in both families for a daughter who could have been born after the last months of 1870 but never appeared on the census.

The current road from Black Oak, Texas to Winnsboro, Texas seems to go near if not through the Antonio Flores survey, where the James H. Dendy family lived. The total distance between Black Oak and Winnsboro is ten miles.

In pondering this problem, I suddenly remembered the mystery photograph from my Dendy great-grandparents' album. 











This is an 1890s copy of three earlier tintypes. These pictures seem to have been taken on the same day since they seem to be sitting in the same chair. One of my cousins found a metal mourning button featuring this identical picture of the man in an old trunk that belonged to my great-grandparents. The question has been which set of great-great-grandparents this photograph portrayed - Dendy or Davis. The man does not resemble my great-great-grandfather, Davis, so he is ruled out. However, my great-great-grandmother Davis had a previous husband who died in the Civil War, and they had a daughter together. However, he died before their daughter reached this age. They could not have all posed in the same chair since he was deceased on the day these portraits were made. 

That puts the spotlight on the Dendys. James Hogan Dendy died in 1892, so a mourning pin made from his picture makes sense. The inclusion of the little girl has always been a question. The Dendys had a daughter born in December 1871. Why wouldn't this photograph have been passed along to her or her family if it was a picture of her? Why make a copy with just one child? Why not include the other children who surely had their pictures made, too? My great-grandfather was born before 1870. There were also other children living at the time these photos were made, why aren't they included in this copy? I now believe that Lydia Ann had this copy made, grouping her deceased husband, herself, and their deceased daughter together in one photo memorial. Or one of the Dendy children had it made for her as a gift. 

There is a picture of a youthful Lydia Ann (Pugh) Dendy that is much clearer than this one. In it, she is wearing a black bead necklace. The photograph of the woman in this group picture is of such a poor quality that it is difficult to positively identify her - although they both had dark hair, worn close to the head.

I'm confident that this is a photograph of the Dendys and their daughter as they appeared in 1874 to 1875. Unless a family Bible is found, the little girl will probably remain nameless. She would have been buried in Wood County, and so far I have not found a tombstone for her online. 

The combination of the newspaper clipping and the photograph shed some light on the mystery of why the Dendys sold out and left Wood County in 1877. Since the clipping recounts that they had been to a "preaching" that fateful day, they would have had to pass the spot in the road where their daughter died every time they went to church. If the church they attended was in the direction of Winnsboro, they would have passed that spot every time they went for supplies. Plus, it would have been the talk of the community for months. I think it must have become unbearable, so they sold out and left their families behind. 

No oral story of this event was passed down in my family. I think it was probably too painful for anyone to speak of. My great-grandfather would have been seven or eight when his little sister was killed, and he would have had a clear memory of this event. If it had happened to a cousin rather than a sister, I think the story would have been recounted. 


Monday, January 1, 2024

Welcoming 2024

  ©  Kathy Duncan, 2024





















Once again it is time to say goodbye to one year and hello to the next. 

Here is a look at 2023 in review. The year ended with 204,317 page views, which was an increase of 52,449. It would be amazing if those figures were accurate. However, they are not. This year foreign bots were trolling the internet and driving up the page view count. There are ways to filter those numbers out, but that is beyond my expertise.

This was not a very year productive in terms of writing new posts. I only managed to write and publish twenty-one. Of those posts, the three most viewed were as follows:

1. Daniel A. Lewis, Son of John D. Lewis. This post was a continuation of my Lewis family research. Daniel is one of the most controversial since family researchers are not in agreement over what happened to him after his first marriage. 

2. Squire Brown, Brother of Isaac S Brown. This was one of my favorite posts. I was able to link Issac S. Brown to at least one other family member other than his own children. As a result, I was contacted by another Brown researcher who has a photo album containing photographs of the Brown family, including my husband's 3X great-grandmother, Catherine E. (Hay) Brown. 

3. Wiley Lewis, Son of John D. Lewis. This was another in a series of posts on the children of John D. Lewis. Wiley turned out to be one of the most interesting of the Lewis sons. He appears to have been a good person who lived large - probably a little too large for his father's approval.

My favorite posts for the year, in no particular order:

1. Mollie F. Brown's Photo Album was a favorite because identified photographs are so difficult to find. Plus, this experience gives me hope that more photographs and family bibles are out there waiting to be shared.

2. Joseph Rutherford Cawthron Returns on the Wheaton was a favorite because it added so much more information to what seems like a small event - a brother's body returned for burial in the U.S. 

3. The Bedside of M. P. Kelley was a favorite because newspapers continue to be one of the most valuable research tools available to us. This small clipping told me that my 2x great-grandfather, M. P. Kelley, had been sick for a few months before his death and that his family was traveling to visit him. 

Even though this has not been the most productive year in terms of publishing, it has been a very productive research year. I have been researching my cousins' ancestor who was a Mexican War veteran. At first, there was not much information about him, and it seemed like not much more could be learned about him. Then the floodgates opened. And I do mean a flood of information. He has turned into the most interesting individual I have ever researched. He is teaching me more about research strategies. Right now, I am organizing and refining the information that I have and plan to write about him in the new year. 


Saturday, October 28, 2023

Joseph Rutherford Cawthron Returns on the Wheaton

 ©  Kathy Duncan, 2023

Recently, a news report reminded me that a former president of the U.S. canceled a trip to the Aisne-Marne American cemetery near Paris in 2018. At the time, he blamed it on the rain. Later it was revealed that was just a convenient excuse, "Why should I go to that cemetery? It's filled with losers." Later in the same trip, he referred to the 1,800 marines who died at Belleau Wood as "suckers" for being killed in battle. The importance of that presidential trip was that it was intended to honor the sacrifice of American soldiers, and it was also intended to mark the 100th anniversary of the end of World War I. 

As stunningly callous and disrespectful as those comments were, they set me thinking about my grandfather's first cousin who died in France during WWI and who was buried there for a short time. Then in 1921, his body was shipped to Sacramento, California, and reinterred there. I started wondering about the circumstances of that reinterment. 

Joseph Rutherford Cawthorn, born in 1893, was the son of Willie Porter Cawthon and his wife Maggie Skelton. Joseph and his four siblings were orphaned in 1904. The siblings seem to have been farmed out to different maternal family members, perhaps neighbors, and at least one orphanage. All of them used the Cawthorn spelling rather than the family's spelling of Cawthon. I'm not sure why that happened except perhaps the name was pronounced with an "r" sound, and the Skeltons thought that was how it should be spelled. 

Joseph's World War I registration card listed his sister Lillian Inez Cawthorn as the person to be notified in the event of his death. Lillie, at age fourteen, was a minor living in Hunt County, Texas.


















Joseph, a mail clerk, died of pneumonia on 14 October 1918 and was interred in France.

Almost three years later, his body was shipped to Sacramento, California to be reinterred in East Lawn Cemetery. For several years, I've had a copy of his burial notice that appeared in the Sacramento Bee on 17 June 1921.















Mrs. S. Mancuso, listed as Joseph's "only close surviving relative," was his little sister, Lillian Inez Cawthorn. 

The former president's words sent me delving back into the circumstances of Joseph's reinterment in Sacramento. I was certain that Lillian did not have the funds to have his body exhumed in France and shipped to Sacramento.

I began by revisiting Joseph's Findagrave memorial. There still was not a photograph of his tombstone. The notation on his memorial said that the exact location of his plot was unknown. I did not make a photo request at that time because the cemetery is too large for any photo volunteer to search it randomly. My next step was to find out if I could determine the location of his grave. For that, I googled the cemetery and located a database for the cemetery's burials. A search for Joseph Cawthorn gave me the section number, row number, and plot number for his grave. I returned to Findagrave and entered that information as a suggested edit. Within a short period of time, Joseph's memorial was updated. Then I made my photo request, which, to my surprise, was fulfilled in just a couple of days. Joseph's grave is unmarked, as I feared, but the Findagrave volunteer kindly laid a bouquet on his grave and photographed that.

My next step was to try to figure out where in France Joseph had been originally buried. I performed a very basic Google search for something like - France cemetery WWI US soldiers. That turned up various items that were published for and following the 100-year anniversary of the end of WWI. One especially informative article written by Michael E. Ruane for the Washington Post was about the process by which bodies were returned to relatives in the U.S. Beginning in 1919, the U.S. government sent out 74,000 questionnaire postcards that asked relatives where they wanted their soldier's final resting place to be - in France or in the U.S. By January 1920, the U.S. had received 63,000 responses. Between 1919 and 1922, about 44,000 U.S. soldiers were returned to the U.S. for burial. Families could choose between a military cemetery or a civilian cemetery. 

So far, I have not been able to locate the postcard that Lillian filled out and returned, but after continuing to Google for information, I found the National Archives database with records for the 44,000 soldiers whose bodies were turned. Among them, I found Joseph's information.


























The ship, the Wheaton, immediately caught my attention. I was sure I'd seen it mentioned in several articles that I had skimmed. Well, duh.

Joseph R. Cawthorn's body had traveled on the Wheaton in the largest shipment of U.S. soldiers' remains to be repatriated to the U.S. The Wheaton landed in Hoboken, New Jersey, on 18 May 1921 with 5,000 deceased soldiers. Five separate funeral services were held at the pier as the caskets were unloaded. President Warren Harding presided over one of the services on May 23, where he laid a wreath and gave a brief speech honoring the men who had given their lives for their country. 

According to the information on Joseph's card, his body had been sent to Antwerp before being loaded onto the Wheaton. The National Archives has a photograph of the group of soldiers' caskets that were loaded at Antwerp; each casket draped with a U.S. flag.

The U.S. WWII Research and Writing Center has an article by Jennifer Holik on "WWI Army Transport Ships," which relates the return of the repatriated remains of soldiers. Her own great-granduncle returned on the Wheaton along with Joseph R. Cawthorn. All of the deceased on the transport ships were listed as passengers - not as cargo. In death, they were afforded a full measure of respect.

My next step was to search newspaper databases to find more information about the Wheaton. I found a wealth of information in an article published by the Galveston Tribune in the Portal to Texas database. On 7 February 1921, the Tribune reprinted an article that originally appeared in the San Antonio Express. It consisted of an interview conducted with Capt. Robert E. Shannon of the U.S. Army who was assigned to the Graves Registration Service and who had been visiting his sister in San Antonio. 

Shannon related that once a soldier's remains were identified by a metal disk that he was wearing at the time of death and removed from the military cemetery in Europe, they were placed in a hermetically sealed metal container. The metal container was then enclosed in a burial casket, which was then placed in a wooden shipping case. The recommendation was for the metal container to remain unopened before the funeral, which was usually arranged by the American Legion. Each casket was draped in an American flag. All of the expenses involved in shipping the remains to its final destination were paid by the U.S. government. Funeral expenses of up to $100 were also paid for by the government. Most of the bodies were transported on the Wheaton. The ship would leave Hoboken carrying emptying caskets to Europe. When it returned to Hoboken with the deceased soldiers, two piers were dedicated to the Wheaton's mission. While in Hoboken, the caskets were guarded until the day they were shipped to one of several distribution centers. Lists were made of the soldiers and their destinations. Then twenty to twenty-five were loaded onto special express cars or baggage cars and were escorted by enlisted Army personnel to a local central distribution point. From there, the deceased soldiers traveled with an individual escort who remained with them until they were delivered to their families. 

Looking back at Joseph's card, there are several pieces of information to unpack. He was buried in grave 430 in the American Cemetery at Toul M-et-M, which turned out to be a temporary cemetery at Toul, Meurthe-et-Moselle. He was in group 91. It's difficult to pinpoint that exactly since there were groups 91A, 91B, and 91C. His sister Lillian's name appears as Lillian Inez Rouse. At the time she was the foster daughter of a Rouse family. Her guardian was a Mrs. Young. I don't know who she was. By the time Joseph was transported to Sacramento, Lillian had married Samuel Mancuso and was living at 4748 Ninth Ave. in Sacramento. 











Friday, October 20, 2023

The Bedside of M. P. Kelley

     ©  Kathy Duncan, 2023

Remember that materials are constantly being added to databases, especially newspaper databases. Periodically, repeat a search that has been done before. For the best results, vary keywords and spellings. Never, never assume that you've already found everything a database has to offer.

I've long been aware of this obituary for my great-great grandfather, Mansel Pinkney Kelley. A copy of it was in his widow's Civil War pension file. Although he had lived in Oklahoma for a few years prior to his death, his obituary was published in Camden, South Carolina, where he was raised and lived well into adulthood. In fact, he enlisted in the army from Kershaw County, South Carolina, during the Civil War.











Repeated searches for a similar obituary in Oklahoma newspapers have garnered zero results. However, my search this week, using the Gateway to Oklahoma database, yielded a social notice that indicated Pink Kelley had been seriously ill for months before his death on 19 June 1912 in Tupelo, Oklahoma. Son, Richard Singleton Kelley, had traveled from the Mt. Pleasant, Texas, area to visit his father. Although M. P. Kelley was able to sit up, he obviously did not fully recover. He was 68 years old at the time of his death.